Nobody knows how to spell email. You might say, ‘nobody knows how to spell e-mail,’ but you’d be wrong. Or would you?
The issue of email vs. e-mail clearly raises blood pressures across the world. At the time of writing, the spelling question is right at the top of the Wikipedia article on e-mail. Meanwhile, a group calling itself the Email Experience Council has declared the official term to be email. They’ve even got a petition.
The Compact OED in Britain allows email, while both Merriam-Webster and the Chicago Manual of Style in the States demand e-mail. It’s interesting to note that the OED prides itself on reflecting trends in spelling and word usage—they were in the news last year for dropping 16,000 hyphens from the Shorter Dictionary (no jokes, please)—while Chicago takes a more dictatorial stance. However, this isn’t really an Atlantic question.
Let’s have a look at the word in the wild:
- Apple uses email
- Microsoft usually uses e-mail but sometimes email
- Adobe uses both
- Google uses email
- Yahoo uses email
- CNN uses e-mail
- Perhaps maintaining the famous “BBC balance”, the BBC website uses e-mail within news stories but seems to use email on the rest of the site
- The New York Times uses e-mail
- direct.gov.uk uses email
- usa.gov uses both
There’s a definite trend here. People who write about technology tend to go for e-mail, while the people who actually work with technology either use email or both. I think that’s a good argument in favour of email.
The argument that supporters of e-mail often make is the lack of precedent. X-ray has never become Xray, T-shirts are not Tshirts, and you drive round an S curve rather than a Scurve. However, these are very specific words which use their initial letter for its shape rather than any specific meaning. If you’re interested, they’re covered in 7.67 of the Chicago Manual of Style. (The possible exception to this is X-ray, where the “X” simply stands for unknown—see also The X-Files and Cold War B-movie X for Unknown.) (Again, the “B” in B-movie isn’t an abbreviation. Even if it was, I don’t see bmovie ever happening.)
Regarding other e-words, the OED still supports e-commerce, e-government, etc. This doesn’t have to be a contradiction, though. The hyphen doesn’t come packed into all words by default. It’s used specifically where it’s needed to aid comprehension. When it’s no longer required it can be removed, as shown by the OED’s latest revision. Unhyphenated, words like ecommerce and egovernment might trip us over, so they need a helping hand. Nobody is seriously in danger of not understanding email. (’What’s this? Email? Some French chap trying to communicate with me through my computer, perhaps. But…how?’)
What we have in e-mail is a spelling which has come into existence and then become antiquated, all within the space of a few short decades. As Angus Stevenson, editor of the Shorter OED, comments in the BBC article linked above, e-mail—with the hyphen—is ’starting to look like something your grandmother might write.’
At least there’s one thing that everybody is agreed on: whether it’s e-mail or email, it isn’t capitalised. Unless it’s at the beginning of a sentence, obviously.
Note: this post first appeared on my old blog, The Serial Comma, in September 2007. That domain now forwards here, and there are a few links pointing in to that page, so I’ve updated it and reposted it here.
















May 25th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
I’ve just realized, after reading your article, I don’t believe I’ve even though how about whether I typed “e-mail” or “email”, but I’m pretty sure I’ve typed “e-mail” all of my life.
It isn’t like I’m against using “email”, I’m just so use to typing “e-mail” that it actually might take me longer to type “email” instead of “e-mail” because I would have to think about it, at least until I get use to it.
Perhaps that’s what I’ll do. Heck, I’m one of the laziest people I know, so a little bit a work to break a small habit to save myself from typing thousands of hyphens in the future might pay off.
Then again, with the rate technology is moving, “typing” will become obsolete soon, and I might not have to type another hyphen again.
June 17th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
Thanks for the research and post! I expect kids in 5 years to be mispronouncing it “em ail” with the short e.
Maybe you should join the hip crowd and change your comment field from “Mail” to “email”.
June 17th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Oops, I hadn’t noticed that…
Something to do in my next web session!
July 2nd, 2008 at 5:49 pm
[...] up the search term email vs e-mail and you will find several discussions on the topic. Rob has a nice post on this topic in his [...]
August 21st, 2008 at 8:55 pm
[...] with a hyphen versus spelling ‘email’ without a hyphen. I found interesting articles at The Fiction Desk, Digital Quest and Motivated Grammar. The consensus seems to agree with what I’ve personally [...]
September 25th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
What I understand is that Merriam-Webster English dictionaries rely on professionally edited works, scholarly publications, and other documented sources, whether in print or available from such online sources as the LexisNexis database (as opposed to Internet search engines, which yield results from just about any type of source, including garbage and incidences of English words used in non-English context). So, naturally, these dictionaries would reflect the usages and would show the commonest forms of words found in professionally edited printed books, newspapers, journals, and the like. Merriam-Webster acknowledges the usage variation in the English language and doesn’t prescribe one form of a word over another. They merely document the language and enter in their dictionaries the most common form of the word found in documented sources I mentioned above. So, perhaps Merriam-Webster will add the variant form “email” in its dictionaries if the form goes anywhere near in frequency to “e-mail” in those sources in the future. Thank you for reading my comment.
September 25th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
Hi Felix,
Thanks for taking the time to comment. I think the issue here is that Merriam-Webster, OED, etc. take their usage from reputable media sources, while those same sources take their usage from the dictionaries. This creates a loop which can be a little slow to pick up on authentic changes to spelling or usage.
In this case, I’m suggesting that the people who work most with email, eg those in the technology industry, have adopted the “email” spelling, and that it’s therefore worth looking at adopting that one as the standard. In time, I think we will, and that’s backed up by Oxford’s acceptance of the spelling, on both sides of the Atlantic.
The disparity between “official” and actual usage is clear in the BBC website, which uses one spelling for their general site and the other for their news content.
I should probably also point out that when I talk about Google using “email” over “e-mail”, I’m talking about their own online content and information, rather than their search results!
September 25th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Thanks, Rob. I was talking only of what I know about the descriptive Merriam-Webster, which, judging from their dictionary-making policy and the current state of the word in question, I think will not be interested in adopting only the form “email” as the standard between the two (see the Explanatory Notes section of Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, under “Main Entries,” for an explanation) nor will they demand “e-mail” (see under “Main Entries” again). You’re right about the loop, but not everyone is in that loop. (Thanks to Oxford for somewhat breaking the loop.) Maybe Merriam-Webster now acknowledges and accepts the form “email” and might enter it as a variant form of “e-mail” in the next edition or printing of the Collegiate.
Also, I knew that you’re talking about Google’s online content, not their search results, under “the word in the wild” list.
October 27th, 2008 at 10:01 pm
As a former English teacher and (more recently) IT programmer and consultant, I strongly prefer “email”. There is no benefit to the hyphen, and the commonly accepted contraction ought to be preferred.
After all, you know what they say about excessive hyphenation…
“…here to-day, gone to-morrow!”
[P.S. Yes, that is exactly how "today" and "tomorrow" used to be spelled.]
November 12th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
I work in the Internet industry (I co-founded Wikipedia) and I’ve always used “e-mail” and I am the determiner of all that is hip, too! OK, not really. I’m sure I’m not hip at all. But since when did hipness determine orthography? For that matter, since when did coders, who in my experience are often rather poor writers, outweigh professional journalists specifically on matters orthographical? If football players started writing “futbol” would you prefer their spelling over the sports journalists? Also, the hyphen seems to have a function, but I’m hard pressed to say precisely what it is. No, sure it’s clear enough–you say the long “e” in pronouncing the word, and if there’s no hyphen, the word ceases to be phonetic. The same thing justifies “t-shirt,” “x-ray” and the rest. Also, I’d like to point out that the “email” spelling is nothing new, of course…
November 13th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Hi Larry,
I agree that you wouldn’t look to an individual coder’s or sportsman’s writing for best-practice spellings, but I don’t think that’s what I did here. The sources I quoted weren’t the amateur writing of people in the industry, but professional communications from within the industry, directed at the general public. Not a programmer’s blog but the publicity materials of Apple, Adobe, and Microsoft, the British and American government websites, and the communications of media leaders like the BBC, Google, and Yahoo (no sniggering at the back).
So a better analogy might be not how football players spell the name of their game, but how the professional associations, leagues, equipment manufacturers and sports magazines spell the word in their published materials. And those are exactly the sort of sources you’d expect to go to if you were updating a dictionary of sports terms.
January 9th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Words do not exist in a vacuum, and the spelling of a word should take into consideration the need for consistency and symmetry in the language.
Virtually all English words that use a single letter as a prefix are connected to the stem with a hyphen, q.v.:
A-bomb not Abomb
T-shirt not Tshirt
X-ray not Xray
I-beam not Ibeam
S-curve not Scurve
…etc.
Other than the corrupted form “email” I am unable to find another word that is an exception to this rule. Moreover, using the hyphen is consistent with other compounds using “e” as a short-form for “electronic,” q.v.
e-commerce not ecommerce
e-business not ebusiness
e-registration not eregistration
e-map not emap
e-paper not epaper
e-cash not ecash
…etc.
Words like “to-day” becoming “today” are not analagous, because those words are not formed with a single-letter prefix.
January 22nd, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Lewis,
Trying to adhere to regularity in a natural language is an exercise in futility. These things happen. You’re free to continue writing “e-mail”, but your efforts to convince others are not going to be very effective in the long run.
January 29th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
I don’t know when I stopped using e-mail but it was years ago. I’m another English teacher turned web designer now working for a US corporation. That style guide uses e-mail which is driving all of us in my section crazy.
Of course, email is phoneically e-mail – how else would you pronounce it? It’s essentially a made up word to begin with and considering the speed of technological changes today, e-mail is “like, twenty century, man!”
Language is going to change faster now and in the future. Many hyphenated words drop the hyphen as usage demands – and the demand continues to speed up as our world speeds up!
January 30th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
We should meet facetoface to have a catchall discussion about the misuse of punctuation by hyphendropping writers in newfangled words.
February 6th, 2009 at 5:00 am
thankee.
March 20th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
As an English teacher, I prefer “e-mail” for the sensible reasons that have been stated by previous posters. Additionally, though, there is no rule in English phonics that would lead someone to pronounce “email” as “EE-mail.” Words like egalitarian, Egypt, egress, egret or ego all are exceptions to the rules of English phonics. In nearly all cases, “e”/consonant/vowel is pronounced with either the short e sound or the schwa.
So, for issues relating to compounding words with an initial letter (H-bomb) as well as for maintaining the logic of phonetic rules, I will continue to teach my students to use “e-mail.”
April 13th, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Why don’t we just drop the word email/e-mail from the English vocabulary and call it simply “mail”? Anyway, at the rate mail exchanges are going around using the Internet, the post office may go bankrupt anytime soon, at least will save the word “mail” from going with the fate of the dinosaurs, lol.
August 4th, 2009 at 12:06 am
All good points. I was inclined toward email, but now I’m back on the fence.
I think email just looks like it should be pronounced EM-ail. Like Emily. On the other hand, emissions is not pronounced EMissions, is it?
I do agree that we need all the time-savers (timesavers) we can get. How much time could we save if we didn’t have to type that annoying hyphen?
I like the idea of going straight from e-mail to mail…Then, that other kind of mail can be snail mail, or s-mail. Or smail.
E-mail is not really a made-up word. It was once electronic mail, yes? And, I know H-bomb was hydrogen bomb. But what was T-shirt?
August 4th, 2009 at 9:33 am
Hi Martha,
The New Oxford American Dictionary suggests that T-shirts get their name because they have the shape of a T when laid out flat.
August 20th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
I think some people want us to be spelling it tshirt.
Looks silly without the hyphen, doesn’t it?
October 22nd, 2009 at 6:09 pm
There are well over 300,000 entries in the OED. Are we expected to memorize how to pronounce every one? Of course not. That’s what phonics rules are for. That’s also why it is important to maintain those rules as we add new words because at the rate we are inventing new terms, the dictionary could easily double in size within our lifetimes.
Parsing the character stream “email” into syllables should result in em_ail, because without the hyphen, the letter E would have to form its own syllable, which is odd in the extreme. “Em” is the name of the letter M. Is M sick? No, I don’t think so. What we really have with “email” is a case of e-lazy and e-sloppy with a dash of e-ignorance and e-apathy thrown in.
As for the argument that professionals are using “email” so it must be right, consider the case of Hewlett-Packard, who in 2001 paid some big bucks to buy the back cover of several trade rags to advertise their storage array, then obviously couldn’t scrape up enough to pay a copy editor. The result was an advertisement which didn’t actually say what they obviously meant.
When people communicate casually, such as in a forum like this, it is expected there will be typos, a few outright spelling mistakes, and some improper grammar. The casual and informal nature of the forum lessens the expectation of strict correctness. This is both customary and logical, but as our society becomes more electronically connected, people seem to be loosing the ability to recognize the distinction between situations where they need to think, compose, edit, and THEN orate versus situations where they are hangin with their BFF and suckin down brewskies at the sports pub.
People who should know better will often make horrible language mistakes in forums where they should have taken more care with their writing. Does that make it OK? Of course not.
The ONLY argument I have seen for “email” that makes sense is that it is the form required by IETF. Since IETF owns the standards which glue the Internet together, it is reasonable that they can name their baby what they want to. Of course that would make it a proper noun, so then we should be writing “Email” rather than “email”.
Personally I prefer “E-mail” with a capital E. It is a stand-in for “electronic”, so that makes it an acronym, but often overlooked is the problem that E-mail is often used incorrectly from a grammatical sense.
In traditional mail, we send letters, which contain messages and are enclosed within envelopes. Collectively or generically they are called mail, but when we refer to a particular piece of mail, we never refer to it as a mail. It is a letter or a card. Terms for electronic mail should follow logically, so when someone says, “That E-mail contains a virus”, they aren’t really saying what they probably mean.
October 23rd, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Carey’s comment at number 13 above is the endpoint of this discussion; nothing further needs to be said. There is no point in arguing with logic for ‘e-mail’ or ‘email’ – people will write it whichever way they wish and my expectation is that the hyphen will disappear in most usages before long.
January 26th, 2010 at 10:49 pm
I’m with Lewis above #12. Structure is a better direction than chaos for obvious reasons. …looking at the big picture.
Correct spelling is e-mail.
Spelling it without a hyphen crosses the border into “slangsville, man…”
March 4th, 2010 at 9:51 pm
While on the subject of mail without the “e”, has anyone wondered why the Royal Mail delivers post, and the US Postal Service delivers mail?